Skip to main content

Taste of Vista

I had a taste of Vista this weekend on my friend's laptop. I think Microsoft shot itself in the foot with their over protective security features. I'm pretty sure users will get exhausted with "Are you sure you.....? after some time. I dont understand why I have to confirm every time I open an application. Didn't M$ft think about how it will ruin the end user experience?
My friend created a website in .Net and wanted to host it in IIS. To successfully host the website in IIS we had to go through a multi layered defense system. We overcame the first line of defense by turning on the IIS feature, which I think is good. Then came the second line of defense which is "No permissions to....." to which we did not have a straight answer. After spending some time on Google with no luck, we stumbled on the answer by chance. (We had to give IUSR account permissions on the physical directory that contains the website). I thought well this is the answer and tried to launch the website from IE, and Vista threw a third line of defense which is IIS do not have permission to run ASP.Net. With the help of Google we passed the third of line of defense to successfully run our website in IIS.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clear Validation Errors and Validation Summary messages

ASP.net built in validation does not provide us a straight forward to clear all the validation errors. This would be really helpful while resetting a form. The reset html button would simply reset the form values but will not clear the validation errors. The following javascript code snippet can be used to clear the validation error messages. Have a reset button on your form and call the following js function onclick. <input type="reset" onclick="HideValidationErrors();" /> function HideValidationErrors() { //Hide all validation errors if (window.Page_Validators) for (var vI = 0; vI < Page_Validators.length; vI++) { var vValidator = Page_Validators[vI]; vValidator.isvalid = true; ValidatorUpdateDisplay(vValidator); } //Hide all validaiton summaries if (typeof (Page_ValidationSummaries) != "undefined") { //hide the validation summaries

Kill a remote user session remotely

When trying to connect to your Windows 2000/2003 server remotely, you may receive the following error. "The terminal server has exceeded the maximum number of allowed connections." You could kill one or more of those connections by using PsExec tool that can be downloaded from the following link. This tool and a bunch of others were developed by SysInternals which was bought by Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/utilities/pstools.mspx Open your command prompt and from the directory that contains the psexec utility, do the following 1) psexec \\x.x.x.x -u user -p password cmd (this will give you access to the cmd prompt on the server) Example: psexec \\127.0.0.1 -u admin -p password cmd 2) once you get the command prompt run the command qwinsta to get a list of all Terminal Services connections. Each connection has an Id Number. 3) Run the command logoff [id# of session to quit] /v (this will kill the connection with that id #) Example: logoff 2 /v Once

Creating a Windows Task Scheduler Service

Recently, one of my friends asked me for help in creating a windows service for scheduling some tasks. He said that he could not use the task scheduler that comes with Windows as the Task Scheduler expects each task to be a stand alone executable file. All his tasks were in a single class library and it would be a lot of work to separate each task into its own executable. Also he said that that the schedule for the tasks could change from time to time and it would be nice if he could configure the tasks in an XML file. To Recap, the requirements for the windows service are 1) The tasks should be loaded from a class library 2) The schedule information for the tasks should be configurable in an XML file. We googled (binged :)) for the solution and found an excellent article by Ajit Kumar Application Scheduler Service Using C#.Net And XML to base our solution upon. We took some good points like configuring the task information from the above mentioned article. This is how we to